Sciematics
Talk to a scientist

Industries

Six sectors where we have made the expensive mistakes already, on somebody else's dataset.

Where we are useful

Domain knowledge is not optional

A data scientist who has never seen a credit file will build a default model that quietly encodes the collections flag and reports a spectacular result.

Knowing what a column means, and when it was written, is not a soft skill. It is the difference between a model and a leak. These are the six sectors where we already know which columns lie.

Sector 01

Manufacturing and Industrial

Demand forecasting, predictive maintenance, and visual quality inspection under real conditions.

Demand and inventory forecastingPredictive maintenanceVisual inspectionYield optimisation

Factory lighting, dust, and vibration destroy models trained on clean benchmark imagery. We test on your floor.

Sector 02

Financial Services

Credit risk, fraud detection, and document extraction, in a sector where a model must be explainable to a regulator.

Credit scoring with adverse action reasonsFraud detection at low false positive ratesDocument extractionModel risk documentation

A model that cannot explain a rejection is not deployable in lending, whatever its accuracy.

Sector 03

Healthcare and Life Sciences

Clinical decision support, imaging triage, and operational forecasting, always with a human in the loop.

Imaging triage, not diagnosisReadmission and capacity forecastingClinical documentationTrial data analysis

We build systems that assist a clinician. We do not build systems that replace one.

Sector 04

Logistics and Supply Chain

Routing, ETA prediction, and demand sensing where the cost of being wrong is measurable to the rupee.

ETA and delay predictionRoute and load optimisationDemand sensingWarehouse forecasting

Forecast accuracy matters less than knowing when the forecast should not be trusted.

Sector 05

Retail and Ecommerce

Pricing, recommendation, and inventory, evaluated against a holdout of real customers rather than an offline metric.

Demand and price elasticityRecommendation systemsInventory allocationCustomer lifetime value

Offline recommendation metrics correlate poorly with revenue. We insist on an online test.

Sector 06

Public Sector and Research

Analysis, evaluation, and independent assurance for institutions accountable to the public.

Programme evaluation and causal inferenceIndependent model assuranceSurvey and administrative dataReproducible research pipelines

Work funded by the public should be reproducible by the public. We build for that.

Honest limits

Where we decline

We do not build autonomous trading systems, safety critical control loops for vehicles or medical devices, or any model that makes a consequential decision about a person without human review.

The first two demand a specialisation and a safety culture we do not have. The third we decline on principle, and we would rather lose the work than argue about it later.

Four questions before we accept

01Can the data support this, honestly?
02Is there a baseline worth beating?
03Who does it harm when it is wrong?
04Would we recommend us, for this?
Next step

Send us your data problem. We will tell you whether it is one.

A working data scientist reads every enquiry. You will get an honest read on whether your data can support the model you have in mind, before anyone quotes you a number.